Subject: #30 [*](2401bis) IKEv2

From: Shoichi Sakane <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:53:29 +0900

As the previous discussion in this mailing list, I understand
that it is not important thing where KINK comform to IKEv2
specification.  That was likely to misunderstand.

So I would like to close #30 if anybody does not have any objection.
However we don't forget to describe 2401bis things clearly.