Subject: #15 [**] Principal name of KINK service (section 5.1.2)

From: Kazunori Miyazawa <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:43:44 +0900

Hello,

As someone said, I think the sentence just specifies a name convention.

I think the way of discovering a remote's principal identifier is an
implementation issue. When KINK refering rfc2401bis, PAD would contains a
remote's principal ID. But PAD is ambigous. Anyway it is finally an
implementation issue.

We can care the U2U case in this section with the issue #3.

I think we can close this issue.

--
Kazunori Miyazawa