Subject: helping fans get bikini ready

From: Daniel <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 09:47:30 -0700

DocOz Episode Recap:
Epic Fan transformations | DrOz > Melt Fat > Video

Posted - 

This Episode will leave you feeling motivated and excited for the Summer.

DocOz has a 1 step plan that has fans dropping 1lb per day.

An the results are #Epic. 

View Episode Clip: / http://www.bowformmaw.com/droz/video/fanfav.video

- No Gym - No Starving Involved - Quick Results -

We hope you enjoyed this Episode Recap.
If you changed your mind and dont need notification - write Update Notice Messages
118 Kecks Lane- Ruff Dale- Pennsylvania-- 1 5 6 7 9 or visit http://www.bowformmaw.com/qowj/nwe3.jfei

The sentence "The controller is replaced with a View Model" is not correct. In MVVM what does the role of the controller is databinding (or binding by  	
MVVM will only make sense when using WPF's two way data binding. Otherwise MVC/MVP etc would be sufficient.   Josh Smith: If you put ten software architects into a room and have them discuss what the Model-View-Controller pattern is, you will end up with twelve different opinionsssel East is wrong. I stopped reading after he says the view knows about the controller for MVC. This answer is wrong too. The View Model encapsulates presentation logic and state. For example, whether an action - which the view might represent with a button - is enabled or disabledMVC did not originate on the web. Trygve Reenskaug introduced MVC into Smalltalk-76 in the Even if it were changed to "MVC was popularized through web application design." I would argue that this is speculation without proper citation. Thanks, I didn't know about Smalltalk-76. (Played with other toys back then. :) Jokes aside, it's interesting how old some of these concepts are. - @Dan, what I wrote is: "[MVC] may have been there b
 efore [the web], but the web is how it got popularized to the masses of web developers." I still think that's correct. I don't have a citation for it, but then I don't feel I need one because that MVC mass popularizing is part of my personal experience when I started as a web developer at the beginning of the last decade. Apache Struts was en vogue back then, with lots of beans for MVC I was agreeing with that statement, but it directly conflicts your previous sentence "The first acronym, MVC, originated on the web." which states a web origin as fact. It's like saying "The sky is purple. (Actually the sky is blue, but on rare occasions it has a purp correct, have experienced that! However, 10 from them, 11th from yourself, but where does the 12th it come from - just askin The 11th isn't from yourself. There are 10 total people, and 12 total opinions. The adage is meant to imply that the definitions of these patterns is so open to interpretation that at least two people will be confu
 sed enough to have more than one opinion +1, great answer. which one you are using in your daily work?   I use one that we wrote, because we have very specialist needs for MVVM. It's heavily influenced by the work that Josh did, and I'll be releasing it as Open Source in the near future (I'm busy ripping out the proprietary bits). It's called Goldligh
2	  	
Thanks, great answer.
  	  	
Along with that, what is your data access layer framework? guys.. LINQ, LLBLGen, EF, nHibernate?It depends on the project and requirements. Sometimes we use LINQ, sometimes NHibernate, sometimes Castle ActiveRecord, and sometimes eXpress Persistent Objec Pete, just want to comment that the MVVM Light Toolkit works just the same for WPF 3.5 and WPF 4 as for Silverlight 3 and Silverlight 4. I am careful to keep the features in sync as much as I can. You are right about the blendability though, this is a major concern for me , An update to your answer would be great as the world must have moved on in the last few months   Ian ve been disappointed that MVVM Toolkit hasn't been updated to work with Visual Studio 2010. Might want to add that to the decision making process. Most people I know using MVVM templates within 2010 are using MVVM Light and some migrated to that for this reason aloI'd love to read an update on the state-of-play in MVVM-framework-land, 21 months down the track. I wo
 nder how much the techsperts have weeded, what's blooming, and what they're planting this seasonFor explaining complicated things it in simple wordsAnything changed in the last almost-four years? (Except Josh Smith's defectionMVVM-Light is still going strong