Subject: Re: [L2tpext] draft-ietf-l2tpext-l2tp-atm-02.txt

From: Thomas Narten <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 23:23:38 +0200

> > System security may also be compromised by the attacks of the ATM
> > transport network itself. The ATM Forum has published a security
> > framework [11] and a security specification [12] that define
> > procedures to guard against common threats to an ATM transport
> > network.

> So, is it really the case to say that ATM has no security?

> Ajoy: Is it enough to update security section to be consistent with 
> PPP over AAL2 draft ? The initial security section was 
> written two years back probably lot of things have changed 
> since then.

I believe so. I.e., if the issues are largely similar, than similar
text would seem to apply.

Thomas

_______________________________________________
L2tpext mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext