Subject: Re: Accept ACCEPTOWN COMMUNITY as WG Draft?

From: Marshall Eubanks <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:28:37 -0400

With the extended call for comments, there were 9 messages in support  
of this,
and none opposed.

The consensus is that the working group should adopt this document.

Would the authors please provide a version labeled draft-ietf-l3vpn
for us to adopt ?

Regards
Marshall Eubanks.
Danny McPherson

On Jul 28, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Danny McPherson wrote:

> Folks,
> Rob presented this draft in the L3VPN meeting today and
> asked if we would consider it to be accepted as an L3VPN
> WG draft.  If you're in support of this draft being accepted
> as an L3VPN WG document please reply to this message
> with a "yes", if not, reply with a "no".  Additional comments
> are welcome, but please clearly state your position.
>
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-pmohapat-l3vpn-acceptown-community-00.txt 
> >
>
> Note that this work, if accepted, will need to be cross-WG
> last called in IDR as well, but that should not be an issue if
> there's consensus here that the work should be done.
>
> Please provide feedback on this no later than 8/15.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Marshall & Danny
>
>
>