Subject: [Lake] Issue #103 (Optimization of message size)

From: Göran Selander <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 14:06:57 +0000

Hi,

Following some after-meeting feedback, we think it may be wise to make the optimization mentioned in #103 already in -09 instead of, potentially, after WGLC. This is 180 degrees compared to the proposal yesterday. Some reasoning about the change of view below.

Since this optimization breaks the format of message_2, there needs to be new test vectors, updated implementations and additional interop tests. This causes further delay, also waiting for implementation feedback before we can consider the protocol stable again. By addressing this now we can absorb that time in the plan we set out for specifying and testing -09. So even if we may agree that the optimization is not necessary, considering that this is a small change it seems worth to be proactive here.

Here is a PR:
https://github.com/lake-wg/edhoc/pull/143

If possible, please comment by August 8. We would like merge this and submit -09 soon after that.

Thanks
Göran

From: Lake <[email-masked]> on behalf of Mališa Vučinić <[email-masked]>
Date: Friday, 30 July 2021 at 09:40
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Lake] LAKE @ IETF 111: Follow up and minutes

All,

Thank you for the productive meeting yesterday. We have just posted the minutes [1] and the recording will be published shortly.

Many, many thanks to Marco Tiloca and Robert Wilton for taking notes during the meeting.

As agreed, we will schedule a virtual interim meeting for the end of September, beginning of October. A doodle will follow shortly.

In the meantime, enjoy the summer period!

Mališa

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-111-lake/