Subject: Re: [Lake] Call for adoption of draft-selander-lake-traces

From: Mališa Vučinić <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 12:37:39 +0100

Thanks everyone on the feedback on this adoption call. It seems we have consensus to adopt the draft as a working group document. That said, we will bring up the question of final scope and publication in the RFC form during the IETF 112 meeting next Friday in order to gather more feedback.

@Authors: please, go ahead and submit the draft as draft-ietf-lake-traces.

Mališa and Stephen

> On 18 Oct 2021, at 12:52, Mališa Vučinić <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> As discussed during the IETF-111 meeting and the last interim, this email triggers a 2-week call for adoption of draft-selander-lake-traces-01. The draft contains the EDHOC test vectors, previously part of draft-ietf-lake-edhoc. 
> 
> We are seeking the working group input on the following points:
> - Whether draft-selander-lake-traces should be adopted as a working group item, and if yes:
> - Whether this draft should be published as an RFC
> - What should be the scope of the document? The current version of the draft covers authentication methods 0 (signature - signature) and 3 (static DH - static DH). Should the draft cover additional methods and / or additional intermediary values? Anything else deemed useful from the implementers point of view?
> 
> Please provide your comments by November 1st, 2021.
> 
> Mališa and Stephen
> -- 
> Lake mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake