Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-12

From: Alissa Cooper <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 08:35:49 -0500

Tim, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot and pointed to your review.

Alissa

> On Oct 2, 2019, at 5:09 PM, Tim Evens via Datatracker <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Tim Evens
> Review result: Ready with Nits
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-dtn-bpsec-12
> Reviewer: Tim Evens
> Review Date: 2019-10-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-10-03
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary:
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> Under section 1.4, BPA is referenced in bullet 1 and 2 but is first defined in
> bullet 4.  Suggest defining that in bullet 1.
> 
> On page 10:
> 
> * "never used to sign the cipher- text provided" has an extra space between
> cipher- and text.
> 
> * "The BCB is decrypted by security- aware nodes in the" has an extra space
> between security- and aware.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art