Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [dispatch] Last Call: <draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03.txt> (Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA) to Best Current Practice

From: Timothy Mcsweeney <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 21:14:47 -0400 (EDT)

After taking a look at the draft's new IANA considerations, I have to say that Section 3 is extremely well written.  I had to take another look at RFC 8126 but I think this really checks all the boxes.  BEST current practice indeed.

Maybe it could use just a touch more to keep the crazies out....how about specification required, expert review, IESG review, IAB review, and a spelling test.

On 08/27/2020 3:24 PM The IESG <[email-masked]> wrote:

The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the

following document: - 'Updated registration rules for URI.ARPA'

<draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03.txt> as Best Current Practice

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final

comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the

[email-masked] mailing lists by 2020-09-24. Exceptionally, comments may

be sent to [email-masked] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning

of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

Abstract

This document updates RFC 3405 by removing references to the IETF

tree from the procedures for requesting that a URI scheme be inserted

into the uri.arpa zone.

The file can be obtained via

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update/

No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.

_______________________________________________

dispatch mailing list

[email-masked]

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch