Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [Cbor] Last Call: <draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08.txt> (CBOR tags for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and prefixes) to Proposed Standard

From: Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 09:15:14 +1200

I'll just note that I re-implemented my demo code for RFC8992 using
these tags instead of the format in that RFC, and this was easy and
works well.

Code at https://github.com/becarpenter/graspy/blob/master/pfxm4.py

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 09-Sep-21 07:09, The IESG wrote:
> 
> The IESG has received a request from the Concise Binary Object Representation
> Maintenance and Extensions WG (cbor) to consider the following document: -
> 'CBOR tags for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and prefixes'
>   <draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses-08.txt> as Proposed Standard
> 
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [email-masked] mailing lists by 2021-09-22. Exceptionally, comments may
> be sent to [email-masked] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> 
> Abstract
> 
> 
>    This specification defines two CBOR Tags to be used with IPv6 and
>    IPv4 addresses and prefixes.
> 
> 
>    // RFC-EDITOR-please-remove: This work is tracked at
>    // https://github.com/cbor-wg/cbor-network-address
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The file can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cbor-network-addresses/
> 
> 
> 
> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CBOR mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor
>