Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: RFC 8321 (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring) and RFC 8889 (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance Monitoring)to Proposed Standard

From: Martin Duke <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 07:58:53 -0700

After overwhelming response that we should do so, I am pursuing these
status updates through bis documents.

On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:08 PM The IESG <[email-masked]> wrote:

> The IESG has received a request from an Area Director to make the
> following status changes:
>
> - RFC8321 from Experimental to Proposed Standard
>     (Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance
> Monitoring)
>
> - RFC8889 from Experimental to Proposed Standard
>     (Multipoint Alternate-Marking Method for Passive and Hybrid Performance
>     Monitoring)
>
> The supporting document for this request can be found here:
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-rfc8321-rfc8889-alt-mark-to-ps/
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
> comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> [email-masked] mailing lists by 2021-09-24. Exceptionally, comments
> may
> be sent to [email-masked] instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning
> of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> The affected documents can be obtained via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8321/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8889/
>
> IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-rfc8321-rfc8889-alt-mark-to-ps/ballot/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>