Subject: Re: [ldapext] Re: draft-ietf-boreham-numsubordinates-01.txt

From: Chris Ridd <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2003 13:07:20 +0000

On 31/10/03 3:16 pm, Michael Ströder <[email-masked]> wrote:
> John McMeeking wrote:
>> 
>> I feel that numsubordinates should return 0 when hassubordinates would
>> return FALSE.  Since hassubordinates can include subentries,
>> numsubordinates should also.
> 
> Ok, I agree with that.
> 
> Ciao, Michael.

Since one of the draft's authors is our CEO, I should add that our DSA works
this way. The hasSubordinates value is only TRUE when numSubordinates is
non-zero.

Cheers,

Chris

_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext