Subject: Re: [link-relations] NEW RELATION REQUEST: Relation name: "nofollow"

From: "Michael(tm) Smith" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 01:36:02 +0900

Julian Reschke <[email-masked]>, 2010-10-31 14:21 +0100:

> On 02.09.2010 10:18, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
> > Relation Name:
> >    nofollow
> > 
> > Description:
> >    Indicates that the current document’s original author or
> >    publisher does not endorse the referenced document.
> > 
> > Reference:
> >    http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-nofollow
> > 
> > Notes:
> >    Template to be added to W3C HTML5 specification before
> >    publication of next Working Draft
> 
> Sounds good to me (maybe substiture document with resource, though).

Updated request:

  Relation Name:
     nofollow

  Description:
     Indicates that the current resources’s original author or
     publisher does not endorse the referenced resource.

  Reference:
     http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/links.html#link-type-nofollow

  Notes:
     Template to be added to W3C HTML5 specification before
     publication of next Working Draft

-- 
Michael(tm) Smith
http://people.w3.org/mike