Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of parentorganizationdeprecations

From: "Addison Phillips" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:36:07 -0700

It no longer serves a purpose: omitting Canonical and putting in a Deprecated conveys exactly the same meaning I believe.

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
> Behalf Of Doug Ewell
> Sent: jeudi 7 avril 2005 23:16
> To: LTRU Working Group
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #874] propagation of
> parentorganizationdeprecations
> 
> Addison Phillips <addison dot phillips at quest dot com> wrote:
> 
> > Previously we had only one field, "Canonical", and it served both for
> > mapping and indicating deprecation.
> >
> > Now we have TWO fields, "Canonical" and "Deprecated" and these can be
> > assigned independently and have separate stability guarantees.
> >
> > Thus a subtag can be deprecated (because it was withdrawn) without
> > mapping it to a new tag.
> 
> Is this a suggestion to get rid of all Canonical fields with value "--"
> (dash-dash)?
> 
> -Doug Ewell
>  Fullerton, California
>  http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru