Subject: Re: [Ltru] [psg.com #893] support incremental updates of registry shadows

From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:41:40 -0700

Hi -

As I understand it, this issue was predicated on the assumption
that the registry was potentially large enough, and the sites
needing to shadow it sufficiently numerous, that an incremental
update /retrieval mechanism (as DNS, X.500, webdav, etc.) might
be warranted.

As a technical contributor, I think the primary use case for
the registry file (download by application developers) doesn't
justify anything so elaborate, and would suggest that we reject
this item.

Randy

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru