Subject: RE: [Ltru] Can we live with the resolution of #1026?

From: "Addison Phillips" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:45:19 -0700

My contribution to this hum: I feel that this is resolved.

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
> Behalf Of Randy Presuhn
> Sent: 2005?6?20? 16:45
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Ltru] Can we live with the resolution of #1026?
> 
> Hi -
> 
> The discussion of issue #1026 (started with Jersey and Geurnsey, ended up
> principles for
> handling UN M.49 numeric codes) has quieted down, so I'd like to get a hum
> from the group:
> 
> Can you live with how http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ltru-
> registry-05.txt
> addresses this issue?
> 
> (see http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg02287.html for
> the proposed change)
> 
> Randy, ltru co-chair
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru