Subject: Re: [Ltru] ISO CD 639-6 (was: Re: Language and scriptencodingstandards)

From: Martin Duerst <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:15:49 +0900

I have added a sentence to the charter, as follows:

The working group will also consider how the draft work on
ISO 639-6 may relate to the future development of language tags.

This is much shorter than the proposal below, but in my judgement
says just about the same.

Regards,    Martin.

At 01:34 06/07/28, Mark Davis wrote:
>I agree with that approach, but the last bit needs to be even more tentative, something like:
>
>The working group should also consider ISO 639-6 and whether or how that evolving work might relate to the future development of language tags. Because this work is not mature and may not be suitable for inclusion, it might not appear in the document produced by this working group.
>
>Mark

#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:[email-masked]     

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru