Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: XML format registry?

From: "Randy Presuhn" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:23:56 -0700

Hi -

I'm forwarding this, since David's message was rejected by an IETF server
with a truly bizarre diagnostic
"<<< 550 This message scored 5.9 points. Congratulations!"

Randy
-------------------------------------------------------------

<001501c7cc1d$936f20c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
X-Priority: 3
Message-Id: <[email-masked]>
Cc: "LTRU Working Group" <[email-masked]>
From: David Conrad <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: XML format registry?
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 05:15:41 -0700
To: Randy Presuhn <[email-masked]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0;
X-ELNK-AV: 0
X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;

Hi,

On Jul 21, 2007, at 10:02 PM, Randy Presuhn wrote:
> I look at it a little differently.  IANA is already moving to XML for
> its registries.  Its a question of whether we want to have some say
> in what the XML representation looks like, or whether we're
> confident that
> what IANA decides on will be as good as anything we might come up
> with,
> and that the developer community that uses the registry is better
> served
> by keeping the modified record-jar format as well.

We'll be soliciting input on the XML representation (and transforms
to the "legacy" ASCII text table format) of the various registries
from anyone who cares, and in particular, the working groups (or
other interested parties) responsible for the registries.

Rgds,
-drc

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru