Subject: Re: [Ltru] ISO 639-6

From: "Doug Ewell" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:56:54 -0600

Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote:

>> however I hope ietf will continue to let users apply for their own 
>> variant subtags.
>
> That's what 4646bis does, so I don't see how there's any issue.

John had proposed doing away with this as unnecessary in an 4646ter era 
that included ISO 639-6.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ