Subject: [Lwip] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-05: (with COMMENT)

From: Kathleen Moriarty <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:11:34 -0800

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors-05: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for your research work supporting this document and for a well written draft.

A agree with Spencers comments on scaling from DDoS attacks and with Warren's comments.

I only caught one other typo that I didn't see mentioned in another review.  Section 7:
   These battery-operated or energy scavenging nodes do
   not have enough power to be stay on at all times.