Subject: Re: [magma] DSL Forum request on IGMP

From: Brian Haberman <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:45:32 -0500

Hi Beau,
      One of the issues raised with using ICMP at this time is the 
constraints
on sending ICMP messages in response to multicasted messages.
For example, see item (e) in Section 2.4 of 
draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-v3-07.txt.

Regards,
Brian

On Dec 19, 2005, at 12:09, Beau Williamson wrote:

> Brian, et al,
>
> So why didn't we propose the use of an ICMP message to accomplish 
> this?  I know several of us discussed this as a possible feedback to 
> the DSL forum. Can you expand on why that would be a good option?
>
> Beau Williamson
> At 12/16/2005 07:16 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
>> MAGMA members,
>>      The chairs received a liaison request from the DSL Forum for some
>> work they are doing on IGMP.  The first attachment to this e-mail is 
>> a DSL
>> Forum document outlining their problem space and possible solution.
>> The second attachment is a response that has been drafted to that 
>> proposed
>> solution.
>>
>>      We would like to have MAGMA members review and comment on these
>> documents.  Suggested changes to the response would be appreciated.
>> The chairs will take comments through 12/30/2005.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brian & Isidor
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> magma mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma
_______________________________________________
magma mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/magma