Subject: [Manet-dt] Should the I-bit be included in the common format?

From: Ian Chakeres <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 13:29:46 -0800

In DYMO we have an ignored-bit. When a message is forwarded but the  
message type is unknown, then the ignored-bit is set.

Are there cases when a node would forward a msg-type or tlv-type that  
it did not understand AND it is important for nodes that later  
process that message/tlv to know the that msg-type or tlv-type was  
not processed?

Do you think we should build similar functionality into the common  
packet format?

Ian

_______________________________________________
Manet-dt mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet-dt