Subject: Re: [manet] manet Digest, Vol 90, Issue 11

From: Shailendra <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:49:51 -0800

Hello All,
My question is different from the posted subject , I want to know is
their any forum  for the
VANET :).
Best/-
Shailendra

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 7:11 AM,  <[email-masked]> wrote:
> If you have received this digest without all the individual message
> attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list
> subscription.  To do so, go to
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
> Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get
> MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME.  You can set this option
> globally for all the list digests you receive at this point.
>
>
>
> Send manet mailing list submissions to
>        [email-masked]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email-masked]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email-masked]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of manet digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Your help with Erratum on RFC 5497
>      (Dearlove, Christopher (UK))
>   2. Trying to reply to RFC erratum question
>      (Dearlove, Christopher (UK))
>   3. Re: Trying to reply to RFC erratum question (Ulrich Herberg)
>   4. Re: Trying to reply to RFC erratum question (Teco Boot)
>   5. Re: Trying to reply to RFC erratum question (Joe Macker)
>   6. Re: Trying to reply to RFC erratum question (Joe Macker)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:37:42 -0000
> From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <[email-masked]>
> To: <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>
> Subject: Re: [manet] Your help with Erratum on RFC 5497
> Message-ID:
>        <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> I think I made a similar comment (correct, not very important)
> when this erratum was first posted.
>
> (Note, I'm an author of the RFC in question.)
>
> --
> Christopher Dearlove
> Technology Leader, Communications Group
> Communications and Networks Capability
> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
> Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124
>
> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
> Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
> Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 13 November 2011 02:35
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [manet] Your help with Erratum on RFC 5497
>
>
>                    *** WARNING ***
>
>  This message has originated outside your organisation,
>  either from an external partner or the Global Internet.
>      Keep this in mind if you answer this message.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Can you help me with a small Erratum on RFC 5497
>
> See it at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=1722
>
> I think that the proposed correction is right, although I doubt it is
> very
> important.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:42:50 -0000
> From: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <[email-masked]>
> To: <[email-masked]>
> Subject: [manet] Trying to reply to RFC erratum question
> Message-ID:
>        <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> I just posted, by Reply to All, a reply to Adrian's question
> on erratum to RFC 5497 (agreeing with it). Got put in
> moderator queue as message header said to hit a rule. What
> rule is in place that a straightforward reply to a posting
> by an AD gets hit? (first time I've seen this).
>
> --
> Christopher Dearlove
> Technology Leader, Communications Group
> Communications and Networks Capability
> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
> Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124
>
> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
> Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>
> ********************************************************************
> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
> distribute its contents to any other person.
> ********************************************************************
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:51:44 +0800
> From: Ulrich Herberg <[email-masked]>
> To: "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)" <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [manet] Trying to reply to RFC erratum question
> Message-ID:
>        <CAK=bVC89UtCb6NqwJ91hHnLPZkaJY=[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Chris,
>
> I have approved your email. There are some spam filtering rules in place,
> which we may want to update. (e.g. the other email topic about the working
> group last call is blocked by a rule checking for "call" (as in "Call for
> paper").)
>
> Ulrich
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <
> [email-masked]> wrote:
>
>> I just posted, by Reply to All, a reply to Adrian's question
>> on erratum to RFC 5497 (agreeing with it). Got put in
>> moderator queue as message header said to hit a rule. What
>> rule is in place that a straightforward reply to a posting
>> by an AD gets hit? (first time I've seen this).
>>
>> --
>> Christopher Dearlove
>> Technology Leader, Communications Group
>> Communications and Networks Capability
>> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
>> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
>> Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124
>>
>> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
>> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
>> Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
>> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>>
>> ********************************************************************
>> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
>> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
>> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
>> distribute its contents to any other person.
>> ********************************************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/attachments/20111114/d024afb1/attachment.htm>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:47:20 +0100
> From: Teco Boot <[email-masked]>
> To: Ulrich Herberg <[email-masked]>,       "Dearlove, Christopher (UK)"
>        <[email-masked]>
> Cc: "[email-masked] IETF" <[email-masked]>
> Subject: Re: [manet] Trying to reply to RFC erratum question
> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Maybe it is a smart filter, blocking "not very important" mails :-)
> Second thought: your mails are important.
>
> Teco
>
> Op 14 nov. 2011, om 11:51 heeft Ulrich Herberg het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> I have approved your email. There are some spam filtering rules in place, which we may want to update. (e.g. the other email topic about the working group last call is blocked by a rule checking for "call" (as in "Call for paper").)
>>
>> Ulrich
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> I just posted, by Reply to All, a reply to Adrian's question
>> on erratum to RFC 5497 (agreeing with it). Got put in
>> moderator queue as message header said to hit a rule. What
>> rule is in place that a straightforward reply to a posting
>> by an AD gets hit? (first time I've seen this).
>>
>> --
>> Christopher Dearlove
>> Technology Leader, Communications Group
>> Communications and Networks Capability
>> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
>> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
>> Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124
>>
>> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
>> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
>> Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
>> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>>
>> ********************************************************************
>> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
>> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
>> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
>> distribute its contents to any other person.
>> ********************************************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/attachments/20111114/42d103e4/attachment.htm>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:58:30 -0500
> From: Joe Macker <[email-masked]>
> To: Teco Boot <[email-masked]>
> Cc: "Dearlove, Christopher \(UK\)" <[email-masked]>,
>        "[email-masked] IETF" <[email-masked]>
> Subject: Re: [manet] Trying to reply to RFC erratum question
> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> I have seen a few of these hit rules popping up recently.
> I have not modified anything but will look into this.
>
> The original list users only post rule exists as it reduced large amounts of spam in years past.
> Users can put in alternate emails,etc for themselves.
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 6:47 AM, Teco Boot wrote:
>
>> Maybe it is a smart filter, blocking "not very important" mails :-)
>> Second thought: your mails are important.
>>
>> Teco
>>
>> Op 14 nov. 2011, om 11:51 heeft Ulrich Herberg het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> Chris,
>>>
>>> I have approved your email. There are some spam filtering rules in place, which we may want to update. (e.g. the other email topic about the working group last call is blocked by a rule checking for "call" (as in "Call for paper").)
>>>
>>> Ulrich
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>> I just posted, by Reply to All, a reply to Adrian's question
>>> on erratum to RFC 5497 (agreeing with it). Got put in
>>> moderator queue as message header said to hit a rule. What
>>> rule is in place that a straightforward reply to a posting
>>> by an AD gets hit? (first time I've seen this).
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christopher Dearlove
>>> Technology Leader, Communications Group
>>> Communications and Networks Capability
>>> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
>>> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
>>> Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124
>>>
>>> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
>>> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
>>> Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
>>> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>>>
>>> ********************************************************************
>>> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
>>> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>>> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
>>> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
>>> distribute its contents to any other person.
>>> ********************************************************************
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> manet mailing list
>>> [email-masked]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> manet mailing list
>>> [email-masked]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:11:34 -0500
> From: Joe Macker <[email-masked]>
> To: Ulrich Herberg <[email-masked]>
> Cc: "Dearlove, Christopher \(UK\)" <[email-masked]>,
>        [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [manet] Trying to reply to RFC erratum question
> Message-ID: <[email-masked]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Yes that's bad I see some regexp rules in there related to filtering CFPs and simulation system questions.
> Probably from Ian but not sure.
>
> I just removed some of matches that seemed non-specific. like "Call for"
> This messages were generally only held briefly and to avoid CFPs,etc.
>
> Hopefully this will help there are still some things there to help avoid CFPs,etc.
> Ulrich can you doublecheck these as well.
>
> -Joe
>
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 5:51 AM, Ulrich Herberg wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> I have approved your email. There are some spam filtering rules in place, which we may want to update. (e.g. the other email topic about the working group last call is blocked by a rule checking for "call" (as in "Call for paper").)
>>
>> Ulrich
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> I just posted, by Reply to All, a reply to Adrian's question
>> on erratum to RFC 5497 (agreeing with it). Got put in
>> moderator queue as message header said to hit a rule. What
>> rule is in place that a straightforward reply to a posting
>> by an AD gets hit? (first time I've seen this).
>>
>> --
>> Christopher Dearlove
>> Technology Leader, Communications Group
>> Communications and Networks Capability
>> BAE Systems Advanced Technology Centre
>> West Hanningfield Road, Great Baddow, Chelmsford, CM2 8HN, UK
>> Tel: +44 1245 242194  Fax: +44 1245 242124
>>
>> BAE Systems (Operations) Limited
>> Registered Office: Warwick House, PO Box 87,
>> Farnborough Aerospace Centre, Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6YU, UK
>> Registered in England & Wales No: 1996687
>>
>> ********************************************************************
>> This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
>> recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
>> recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
>> You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
>> distribute its contents to any other person.
>> ********************************************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> manet mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> manet mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/manet
>
>
> End of manet Digest, Vol 90, Issue 11
> *************************************
>