Subject: Re: [manet] #1: Discussion about naming for the IETF reactive protocol

From: "manet issue tracker" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 21:20:40 -0000

#1: Discussion about naming for the IETF reactive protocol

Comment (by [email-masked]):

 I agree with the name as AODVv2 is suitable for the new reactive protocol
 because it depends on the AODVv1. As we new versions of protocols like IP.

-- 
-----------------------------------+------------------------------
 Reporter:  [email-masked]  |       Owner:  Charlie Perkins
     Type:  task                   |      Status:  new
 Priority:  minor                  |   Milestone:
Component:  dymo                   |     Version:
 Severity:  Active WG Document     |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  reactive naming        |
-----------------------------------+------------------------------

Ticket URL: <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/manet/trac/ticket/1#comment:1>
manet <http://tools.ietf.org/manet/>