Subject: [manet] [Errata Rejected] RFC3561 (3966)

From: RFC Errata System <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 03:57:50 -0700 (PDT)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC3561,
"Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=3561&eid=3966

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Dale Worley <[email-masked]>
Date Reported: 2014-04-16
Rejected by: Adrian Farrel (IESG)

Section: 3

Original Text
-------------
       <NamingAuthority> = *(<NamingAuthority>  ".") <NAsegment>

Corrected Text
--------------
       <NamingAuthority> = *(<NAsegment>  ".") <NAsegment>

Strictly speaking, this is an editorial change because the corrected
BNF generates the same strings as the original BNF.  But the corrected
BNF is far easier for the reader to understand; it matches how people
think about the syntax.

Notes
-----

 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
There is no such text in this RFC. I suspect the reported has fat-fingered the RFC number.

--------------------------------------
RFC3561 (draft-ietf-manet-aodv-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing
Publication Date    : July 2003
Author(s)           : C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, S. Das
Category            : EXPERIMENTAL
Source              : Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG