Subject: [MBONED] draft-acg-mboned-multicast-models-00.txt

From: Tim Chown <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:53:09 +0000

Hi,

Here’s the draft we referred to in the discussion of draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-03.

It’s very rough, but hopefully enough to help frame a discussion in Berlin.

Currently, it seems the only documented rationale for when/why to use SSM is the text in the introduction of RFC4607 itself, which is just coming up for its 10th birthday.

Tim

Begin forwarded message:

From: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: I-D Action: draft-acg-mboned-multicast-models-00.txt
Date: 8 July 2016 at 21:30:55 BST
To: <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Reply-To: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.

       Title           : Multicast Service Models
       Authors         : Mikael Abrahamsson
                         Tim Chown
                         Lenny Giuliano
Filename        : draft-acg-mboned-multicast-models-00.txt
Pages           : 13
Date            : 2016-07-08

Abstract:
  The draft provides a high-level overview of multicast service and
  deployment models, principally the Any-Source Multicast (ASM) and
  Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) models, and aims to provoke
  discussion of applicability of the models to certain scenarios.  This
  initial draft is by no means comprehensive.  Comments on the initial
  content, and what further content would be appropriate, or indeed
  whether the draft is of value, are welcomed.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acg-mboned-multicast-models/

There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acg-mboned-multicast-models-00