Subject: Re: IPfax package comments re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-megaco-h2 48f-00.txt

From: Jean-Francois Mule <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 05:26:59 -0700

Glen,
Thank you for the clarifications and for the pointers to the public ITU
draft docs.  See comments below.
---
Glenn Parsons wrote:
> They are defined in T.38.  Annex E is on H.248 and Annex D is on
> SIP/SDP.  Perhaps the authors thought that was obvious (or
> that it would be included in the references section :-)
> ...
> This is in the T.38 Rec.  It is published as T.38 Amendment 2:
> http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/rec/t/t_38am2.html

2.1. Since both ITU-T references (T.38 Amendment 2 or the TD t.38 annex D)
are not published, can it be referenced in the I-D or rfc?  If yes, would
this annex be publicly available to megaco implementers?

2.2. A way to simplify and solve this would be to include the relevant parts
of annex D or the iana registered SDP attributes in an informative annex of
draft-ietf-megaco-h248f-00.txt (... with a notice about the published ref
specs...).
--- end of comments

Jean-Francois Mule'
Clarent Corp