Subject: RE: Caller Id

From: "Michael Brown" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 18:30:02 -0500

Ooops... That is what the draft WILL be on the reissue. Sorry for the
confusion...
 
Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 5:55 PM
To: Brown, Michael [NC1:GW10:EXCH]; megaco ietf
Subject: RE: Caller Id

Michael
 
Was draft-boyle-megaco-alerting-02.txt a typo, or does a version 02 actually
exist?  All the Internet Draft sites that I know of are showing only
draft-boyle-megaco-alerting-01.txt.
 
Martin Taylor
CopperCom

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Brown [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 5:01 pm
To: megaco ietf
Subject: RE: Caller Id

Yes, there is an existing draft which defines a package for CLASS. We are
doing some additional work on this package to address certain ETSI
requirements which were not covered, but the majority of the package will
remain unchanged. Actually, we will be issuing a new version of the package
with the ETSI changes very soon (hopefully within the next week), but in the
meantime, please refer to 

draft-boyle-megaco-alerting-02.txt in the individual submissions section of
the I-D index. We are hoping to take this draft to last call very soon.

Michael Brown 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Dan Elbert [ mailto:[email-masked]
<mailto:[email-masked]> ] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:39 PM 
To: megaco ietf 
Subject: Caller Id 

Hi All 
Has anybody defined a package with Caller Id for an analog line ? 

Dan Elbert 
RADVISION