Subject: RE: [Megaco] Basic doubt

From: "Naidu, Venkata" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:29:02 -0400

-> There is currently nothing in place to guarantee ordered
-> delivery for MG -> MGC messages, since #3 in 9.1 was removed
-> by the IG.  I think we need something and recently brought 
-> this up in the mailing list (see the thread "maintaining the 
-> order of events").

   Why can't MG <-> MGC maintain sequence integrity?
   One int will do the job, I think it is important...
   instead of adding a constraint - Only one outstanding
   message between MG->MGC etc etc!
   (just like other transport protocols do)

--Venkata Naidu

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco