Subject: [Fwd: [Megaco] Basic doubt]

From: Preeti Sharma <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 07:50:16 -0400

Subject: Re: [Megaco] Basic doubt
From: Preeti Sharma <[email-masked]>
To: Atanum <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 07:45:39 -0400

Hi Atanum,
   If I understand your question correctly, this issue is addressed in ANNEX D
(D.1.1)
   "Peer protocol entities are expected to keep in memory a list of responses
that they
    sent to recent transactions and a list of transactions that are currently
outstanding"
Preeti.

Atanum wrote:

> Hi all,
> I have some queries on this string..
> Say a Megacomessage which has been sent gets delayed or some how get lost in
> the network.
> The Message sent after the former reaches safely and is handed over to the
> application over the megaco stack.
> Now the timer for the first message times out and the first message is send
> again... Now who should keep track of
> which of the message is first and which is second...
>
> Should it be in some way that for each gateway a process will keep track of
> the message sent to the gateway and the reply received from it
> and then only the next message be sent.. or is there a way to find out which
> message should be executed first and which one second...
>
> Can somebody please clarify this...
>
> _______________________________________________
> Megaco mailing list
> [email-masked]
> http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco