Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

From: "Tom-PT Taylor"<[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:59:03 -0500

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

>I have uploaded to the following Geneve outputs:
>pl-023_H248_Annex_M5.zip
>pl-024_H248_Annex_N.zip
>pl-027_H248_Packages_Guide.zip
>pl-034_H248_Annex_L_amm1.zip
>2-073r2_Q3_meeting_report.zip

They have been moved to the following place:

using browser
  http://standard.pictel.com/ftp/avc-site/0202_Gen/

using ftp tool
  ftp://standard.pictel.com/avc-site/0202_Gen/

Please note that 0202_Gen.html is the index for all the documents there.

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae
*********************************************************
Global Information and Telecommunication Institute (GITI)
Waseda University
29-7 Waseda University Bldg.
1-3-10 Nishi-Waseda, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
169-0051 Japan
        e-mail: [email-masked]
        Tel: +81 3 3204 8194
        Fax: +81 3 5286 3832
*********************************************************

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco

---

From: "Tom-PT Taylor"<[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:59:03 -0500

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae

---

From: Dan Elbert <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:20:35 +0200

Hi
After reviewing the meeting summary, I'm not clear on how the process is
being done with the IETF.
Are they going to accept v2 as a new Megaco version or a new RFC ? 
If so, when?

Thanks
Dan Elbert
RADVISION

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [email-masked]'
Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae

---

From: Dan Elbert <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:20:35 +0200

Hi

Thanks
Dan Elbert
RADVISION

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [email-masked]'
Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae

---

From: "Tom-PT Taylor"<[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:38:59 -0500

I have submitted H.248v2 as an Internet Draft; it should appear shortly.  At
that point, unless people object, I propose to pass it straight on to the
IESG for IETF Last Call.  We did have an extended WG Last Call over the last
two months.

SG 16 has also published H.248v1 with all the IG corrections merged in as
H.248 Corrigendum 1.  I propose to move that forward also to RFC status.
Basically, H.248 Corrigendum 1 as an RFC will OBSOLETE RFC 3015, and H.248v2
will UPDATE H.248 Corrigendum 1.  Is this acceptable, or should we just
leave custodianship of H.248v1 in SG 16's hands?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Elbert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:B800:EXCH]; [email-masked]'
Subject: RE: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Hi

Thanks
Dan Elbert
RADVISION

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [email-masked]'
Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae

---

From: "Tom-PT Taylor"<[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:38:59 -0500

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Elbert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:B800:EXCH]; [email-masked]'
Subject: RE: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Hi

Thanks
Dan Elbert
RADVISION

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [email-masked]'
Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae

---

From: Dan Elbert <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:50:00 +0200

Thanks
I'm not very familiar with IETF processes.
After last call, does it goes through formal ratification ?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Elbert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:B800:EXCH]; [email-masked]'
Subject: RE: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Hi

Thanks
Dan Elbert
RADVISION

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [email-masked]'
Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae

---

From: Dan Elbert <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:50:00 +0200

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Elbert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:B800:EXCH]; [email-masked]'
Subject: RE: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Hi

Thanks
Dan Elbert
RADVISION

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [email-masked]'
Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae

---

From: "Tom-PT Taylor"<[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:10:16 -0500

Yes, that's right.  Assuming no objections, the IESG advises the RFC Editor
that the document can be published as a Standards Track RFC.  The RFC
Editor's queue is generally a few months long, so it could be up to 6 months
before H.248v2 actually appears as an RFC.

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Elbert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:B800:EXCH]; Dan Elbert; [email-masked]'
Subject: RE: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Elbert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:B800:EXCH]; [email-masked]'
Subject: RE: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Hi

Thanks
Dan Elbert
RADVISION

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [email-masked]'
Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae

---

From: "Tom-PT Taylor"<[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:10:16 -0500

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Elbert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:50 AM
To: Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:B800:EXCH]; Dan Elbert; [email-masked]'
Subject: RE: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Elbert [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 8:21 AM
To: Taylor, Tom-PT [CAR:B800:EXCH]; [email-masked]'
Subject: RE: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Hi

Thanks
Dan Elbert
RADVISION

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom-PT Taylor [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: [email-masked]'
Subject: [Megaco] FW: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

FYI

-----Original Message-----
From: OKUBO Sakae [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 1:49 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Re: SG16 Feb 2002 outputs

Dear Christian,

using browser

using ftp tool

Best regards,

OKUBO Sakae