Subject: Re: [Megaco] Move reply

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 20:06:00 +0530

Hi

I don't think the first command reply should be allowed. We have a command
response corresponding to every command request and by not sending the move
command response in this case, we are not following this rule. Though there is
no information contained in the command (move command) response in this case,
but still it should be sent.

regards
Vivek Bansal

NGN Group
Hughes Software Systems
www.hssworld.com

[email-masked] on 09/04/2002 05:31:54 PM

To:   [email-masked]
cc:    (bcc: Vivek Bansal/HSS)

Subject:  [Megaco] Move reply

What is the right synthax for a reply t a move ?

Termination "Acgw0/T0/C1" is in C=1

Move of Acgw0/T0/C1 to a new context

     MEGACO/1 [10.0.1.195]
     Transaction = 512 {Context = $ {Move = Acgw0/T0/C1 } }

Reply :

     MEGACO/1 [10.0.1.196]:2944
     P=512{C=2{ }}

Is the repy to the "move" command valid ?

I was expecting :

     MEGACO/1 [10.0.1.196]:2944
     P=512{C=2{Move = Acgw0/T0/C1}}

May be the two replies are valid ?

Thank-you for your help
Regards

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco