Subject: [Megaco] MEGACO: Question about H.248.25 - bcasaddr package

From: "Nurit Shenhar" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 16:58:04 +0300

Hi

While looking at H.248.25 and the correction to it from the ITU site
(published at 03/2004), I found out that the list of address coding in
the 'addr' event parameter and the 'addr' signal parameter is not the
same. In the signal it is:
   DTMF 0x0001
   MF   0x0002
   DP   0x0003

While in the event:
   MF   0x0001
   DTMF 0x0002
   DP   0x0003

Is it intentional? If not, can it be corrected to be the same order?

Thanks,

Nurit

************************************************************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential material.
They are intended solely for the use of the designated individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination,use,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

If you have received this email in error please notify [email-masked] and permanently delete the e-mail and files.

***********************************************************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco