Subject: RE: [Megaco] EventBuffering and Events Descriptor

From: "Kevin Boyle" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:22:18 -0400

First, this all assumes LockStep is on.

Scenario 1: E1 is reported, events reporting is disabled and E3 is STILL
buffered.

Scenario 2: Upon receipt of the Events Descriptor with just E2, E1 and E3
are discarded.  Events reporting is still active and the buffer is empty.
Upon detection of E2, E2 is reported and event reporting is disabled.  Any
detected event other than E2 is discarded, including E1 and E3.

Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
Ashish Kumar
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 8:18 AM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [Megaco] EventBuffering and Events Descriptor

Hi,

I have a query about handling of Events Descriptor when Events Buffering is
on.
Considering the following scenarios

Scenario 1
-----------
EventsBufferedDescriptor has following events
    E1, E2, E3
Buffered Events
    E1, E3

A new events descriptor is received with following events:
    E1, E2

In this case E1 will be reported.

Scenario 2
-----------
EventsBufferedDescriptor has following events
    E1, E2, E3
Buffered Events
    E1, E3

A new events descriptor is received with following events:
    E2                        (At this point active event list would have 
E2).

After this when, E2 occurs, should it be reported or buffered ?

If E2 is buffered then, wouldn't it be wrong since Event E2 was requested.
Basically in this case the behaviour is going to depend on the time when E2
occurs.
If E2 occurs before Requested Event was received, then it will be reported.
And if it occurs after that, it will not be reported.
Is this behaviour correct ?

Regards
Ashish 

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco