Subject: 答复: Re: [Megaco] a doubt about audit context of H248V3

From: "FCG SHI Hao" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:44:31 +0800

In the action request, it can contain the command request or context request. The structure and sub-structure of context request doesn't contain the indicator that the context request is audit value
or audit capability. So there is the problem that if there is only context request in the action request, no command request, we would not be able to know it is a value audit or capability audit 
which is required in chapter 7.2.9 of H248 v3.

-----原始邮件-----
发件人: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]]代表
zhuning 17035
发送时间: 2005年9月30日 10:38
收件人: Tom-PT Taylor
抄送: [email-masked]
主题: 回复:Re: [Megaco] a doubt about audit context of H248V3

maybe u do not know what i means. in h248 V3 ,we can audit context .context and command is not in the same level .if we have a action ,in which there is a context audit but NO command. how MGW knows to audit context value or to audit context capbility??

******************************************************************************************
 This email and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or em
ail immediately and delete it!
 *****************************************************************************************

----- 原邮件 -----
从: Tom-PT Taylor <[email-masked]>
日期: 星期五, 九月 30日, 2005 上午0:23
主题: Re: [Megaco] a doubt about audit context of H248 V3

> AuditValue and AuditCapability are two separate protocol commands. 
> They
> have been there from the beginning.  It isn't necessary to make the
> distinction within the descriptors when it is already made at 
> command level.
> 
> zhuning 17035 wrote:
> > 
> > 
> ...
> > 
> > It is a context level audit ,not a termination level audit.So 
> what is
> > the flag of audit type in it? i mean that how to indicate that 
> it is
> > a value audit or capbility audit in of context audit ?
> > 
> ...
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco

_______________________________________________
Megaco mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/megaco