Subject: [MIB-DOCTORS] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for January 10, 2008 Telechat

From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 08:55:23 +0100

Please find below the preliminary agenda of the 1/10 IESG telechat. Please send comments and issues related to the documents on the agenda until Wednesday 1/9 COB. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-psamp-sample-tech-10.txt
    Sampling and Filtering Techniques for IP Packet Selection (Proposed 
    Standard) - 1 of 10 
    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service-03.txt
    A Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service Registration for Internet 
    Calendaring Services (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 10 
    Token: Jon Peterson
  o draft-ietf-shim6-failure-detection-09.txt
    Failure Detection and Locator Pair Exploration Protocol for IPv6 
    Multihoming (Proposed Standard) - 3 of 10 
    Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability. Mark is
handling 
    this for Jari as he is an author 
    Token: Mark Townsley
  o draft-ietf-shim6-proto-09.txt
    Shim6: Level 3 Multihoming Shim Protocol for IPv6 (Proposed Standard)
- 4 
    of 10 
    Note: Please also read draft-ietf-shim6-applicability. Document
Shepherd is 
    Geoff Huston <[email-masked]> 
    Token: Jari Arkko
  o draft-ietf-sieve-body-07.txt
    Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension (Proposed Standard) - 5 of 10 
    Token: Lisa Dusseault
  o draft-ietf-pkix-rfc3280bis-10.txt
    Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate 
    Revocation List (CRL) Profile (Proposed Standard) - 6 of 10 
    Token: Sam Hartman
  o draft-ietf-psamp-protocol-09.txt
    Packet Sampling (PSAMP) Protocol Specifications (Proposed Standard) -
7 of 
    10 
    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-simon-emu-rfc2716bis-12.txt
    The EAP TLS Authentication Protocol (Proposed Standard) - 8 of 10 
    Note: Joe Salowey  is the proto shepherd 
    Token: Sam Hartman
  o draft-ietf-msec-ipsec-extensions-07.txt
    Multicast Extensions to the Security Architecture for the Internet
Protocol 
    (Proposed Standard) - 9 of 10 
    Note: Lakshminath Dondeti is the proto shepherd. 
    Token: Tim Polk
  o draft-ietf-sip-consent-framework-03.txt
    A Framework for Consent-based Communications in the Session Initiation
 
    Protocol (SIP) (Proposed Standard) - 10 of 10 
    Note: Keith Drage is the document shepherd 
    Token: Cullen Jennings

2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
  o draft-arkko-rfc2780-proto-update-01.txt
    IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field (BCP) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Russ Housley

2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-06.txt
    Problem and Applicability Statement for Better Than Nothing Security
(BTNS) 
    (Informational) - 1 of 3 
    Token: Sam Hartman
  o draft-ietf-v6ops-802-16-deployment-scenarios-06.txt
    IPv6 Deployment Scenarios in 802.16 Networks (Informational) - 2 of 3

    Token: Ron Bonica
  o draft-ietf-nea-requirements-05.txt
    Network Endpoint Assessment (NEA): Overview and Requirements 
    (Informational) - 3 of 3 
    Token: Tim Polk

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
NONE
3.2.2 Returning Item
  o draft-adolf-dvb-urn-03.txt
    A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Digital Video
Broadcasting 
    Project (DVB) (Informational) - 1 of 1 
    Token: Lisa Dusseault

3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
	The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
	found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
	IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
	<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
	that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
	not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
	document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
	approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
	IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.

	The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
	the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
	Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
	indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
	document shepherd.

	Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
	be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the document.

3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
  o vCard and CardDAV (vcarddav) - 1 of 3
    Token: Chris Newman
  o Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks (roll) - 2 of 3
    Token: David Ward
  o Cga & Send maIntenance (csi) - 3 of 3
    Token: Jari Arkko

_______________________________________________
MIB-DOCTORS mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mib-doctors