Subject: Re: [mif] #25: Should document that it updates RFC 6434 (node requirements)

From: Alexandru Petrescu <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 19:49:09 +0100

Le 16/11/2012 10:10, Brian E Carpenter a écrit :
> On 15/11/2012 23:33, mif issue tracker wrote:
>> #25: Should document that it updates RFC 6434 (node requirements)
>>
>> Just found some more text that this document needs to note that
>> it's updating.  This time it's in the IPv6 Node Requirements doc:
>
> Hmm. 6434 is Informational and is intentionally a snapshot. I'm not
> sure that formally updating it is appropriate. We didn't
> systematically update 4294 for each new IPv6 spec prior to 6434.

I tend to agree.

However, it is worth noting that v6ops WG has almost two WG items about
Cellular Host requirements, and that the DHCP Route Option draft is
something that may be pertinent to it.

Alex

>
> Regards Brian
>
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6434#section-7.2.2
>>
>> """ 7.2.2.  Use of Router Advertisements in Managed Environments
>>
>> Nodes using the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol for IPv6
>> (DHCPv6) are expected to determine their default router information
>> and on- link prefix information from received Router
>> Advertisements. """
>>
>> This should not be an onerous edit either.
>>
> _______________________________________________ mif mailing list
> [email-masked] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mif
>