Subject: [mile] WG consensus on 5070bis scope (discussion parts 1 and 2)

From: Brian Trammell <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 22:10:38 +0200

Greetings, all,

Many thanks to Roman for organizing the discussion on next steps in 5070bis. 

Having reviewed the discussion to date on the mailing list, there appears to be consensus from the first two discussion points to address (at least) the following issues in trac:

http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/ticket/15: describe missing attributes and classes in text
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/ticket/22: define classes and attributes for actors and tactics
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/ticket/23: define extension point for arbitraty system info
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/ticket/25: new enum values for HashInformation type attr for certs
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/ticket/26: add a class for arbitrary application headers
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/ticket/27: add a class to contain (externally defined) signatures
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/ticket/28: describe time window of indicator validity
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/ticket/30: add indicator-uid attribute to DomainData class

Best regards,

Brian (as chair)