Subject: [Mip6] [Fwd: [Dime] Diameter MIPv6 Bootstrapping: App-ID vs. Service-Type]

From: Vijay Devarapalli <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 07:47:47 -0700

FYI.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [Dime] Diameter MIPv6 Bootstrapping: App-ID vs. Service-Type
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:07:23 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]

Hi all,

we have had long discussions about the App-ID vs. Service-Type usage for
Diameter MIPv6 Bootstrapping.

It is time to see what the group thinks. Please indicate whether you
prefer (1) an App-ID or (2) a Service-Type solution for

(a) NAS-to-AAAH communication (as required by the integrated scenario;
as one part of the solution component)

(b) HA-to-AAAH communication (as used by the split scenario and the
integrated scenario)

It might be useful to state a reason for your decision.

Please also indicate whether some aspects are still unclear to you.

Ciao
Hannes

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6