Subject: [Mip6] [issue80] Review by Dan Romascanu <[email-masked]>

From: admin <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:18:17 +0000

New submission from admin <[email-masked]>:

Comment:
'When the MN roams to another network, the location privacy problem
consists of two parts:  revealing information to its correspondents
and to on-lookers.'

I am wondering if this definition of the problem is not incomplete. I am missing any reference to the threat 
of exposure of the location information via management interfaces. The editors may consider adding 
some clarification text mentioning the fact that adequate protection means should be implemented to 
avoid the exposure of the location information obtained by authorized correspondents or visited networks 
ebtities via management interfaces or protocols.

----------
category: Editorial
draft: draft-ietf-mip6-location-privacy-ps
messages: 268
nosy: admin
priority: Should fix
status: Pending
title: Review by Dan Romascanu <[email-masked]>

_________________________________________________
Mip6 issue tracker <[email-masked]>
<http://www.mip4.org/issues/tracker/mip6/issue80>
_________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Mip6 mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mip6