Subject: Re: [MEXT] FW: NEMO Solution Space for Aviation

From: "Templin, Fred L" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:52:18 -0700

Will,

Terry Davis pointed me to the ICAO ACP-WG-I meeting
minutes also, and have gone over the working papers from
the past meetings. The minutes seem to show a limited set
of contributers producing the majority of the materials,
and am not seeing definitive results based on operational
experience, fielded deployments, etc.

A number of the working papers have kept a balanced
consideration of alternatives, including MIPv6, HIP
and MOBIKE. (Even in the Working Paper #8 document you
cited, "global mobility management protocol" is defined
in non-exclusive fashion.) So, am not seeing the basis
for conclusions at the moment.

Thanks - Fred
[email-masked]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RCN0) 
>[mailto:[email-masked]] 
>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 3:03 PM
>To: [email-masked]
>Subject: [MEXT] FW: NEMO Solution Space for Aviation
>
>International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) WGI (Internet) as has
>agreed to mandate Mobile IP for aircraft and have developed a draft
>addressing scheme for on-board prefixes. Some of the results are
>documented on the report of Working Papers 7 and 8.
>
>http://www.icao.int/anb/panels/acp/wgdoclist.cfm?MeetingID=234
>
>I need to check if MIPv6 or a MIPv6 NEMO-base solution has been
>proposed. 
>
>/Will
>
>
> 
>_______________________________________________
>MEXT mailing list
>[email-masked]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>
_______________________________________________
MEXT mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext