Subject: [Mipshop] FMIPv6

From: Mikko Hautala <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:49:54 +0200

Hi,

According to the FMIPv6 RFC, the temporary tunnel is between PAR and MN 
(or pCoA and nCoA).

After reading some papers studying FMIPv6 handovers, it seems that at 
some point (in some draft) the tunnel based handover was fundamentally 
different. The tunnel was between PAR and NAR, and the MN continued to 
use the pCoA in the NAR's subnet (hence the MN was unaware of the tunnel)

My question is why was this approach discarded ?

Regards,
Mikko Hautala
[email-masked]

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop