Subject: Re: [Mipshop] Action:draft-zhao-mipshop-fmip-pfmip-00.txt

From: David Cypher <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 08:57:52 -0400

Comments
1)
I thought by definition of PMIP, the MN was unaware and not 
involved.  That is a MN did not support PMIP.
If this is still true, how can the first sentence of 3 (page 4) be true?

"A MN may support both MIP and the PMIP."

2)
With the release of
draft-ietf-mipshop-pfmipv6-00.txt
will 9.1 page 11 normative reference #2 be updated accordingly?

David Cypher

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop