Subject: Re: [Mipshop] Mipshop Digest, Vol 71, Issue 3

From: Jorge Espi Aleman <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:22:04 +0100

Dear Rajeev,

My work on route optimization is better described by the draft I submitted on 2010-03-23. Here a link to it: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-espi-ietf-mipshop-profmipv6/

This draft proposes a modification on the FMIPv6/MIPv6 signalling so that route optimization is carried out proactively. This draft does not address multihomed nodes. However, I believe some scenarios (such as those where the PAR-NAR delay is high) would be benefited from simple modifications built up from the draft.

Regards,
Jorge 

>Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:20:33 -0700
>From: Rajeev Koodli <[email-masked]>
>
>Hello Jorge Espi,
>
>could you elaborate what you have in mind?
>
>Regards,
>
>-Rajeev

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Jorge Espi Aleman
<[email-masked]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Any thoughts on extending the classical FMIPv6 (RFC 5568) or MIPv6?s Return
> Routability (RFC 3775) to multihomed Mobile Nodes?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jorge Espi
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mipshop mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop
>
>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Mipshop mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mipshop

End of Mipshop Digest, Vol 71, Issue 3
**************************************