Subject: RE: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback

From: "Hedayat, Kaynam" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:34:47 -0500

Cullen,

Are you recommending two drafts or adding a new loopback mode for the
simple case?

Regards,
Kaynam 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:27 PM
> To: MMUSIC WG
> Subject: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback
> 
> 
> This has a lot of complicated stuff in it and seemed like 
> some people might want an 80/20 sort of rule approach. It 
> made me wonder if we should split into simple loopback and 
> complex. complex could be everything here while simple would 
> by rtp-media-loopback only and the offeror would always be 
> the lookback-source. In the simple mode, if the devices was 
> behind a nat, we would assume that whatever it normal did to 
> "prime" the nat, such as stun, ice, suicide packet, whatever, 
> was the same thing that the device normally did for normal media.
> 
> I realize that simple mode is not as flexible but I am 
> wondering what test modes we really need that it does nt 
> provide. Seems it is 95% of the functionality for 5% of the 
> work and you could still have the complex mode for devices 
> that wanted to do that.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> 

_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic