Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Poll for consensus on WG item: SDP extension to classify traffic

From: "Miguel A. Garcia" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:44:08 +0200

I believe we have support to adopt the traffic-class draft as WG item.

Please, authors, submit the next version as a WG item.

/Miguel

On 30/09/2011 21:21, Ali C. Begen (abegen) wrote:
> +1
>
> -acbegen
>
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:35 PM, "Gonzalo Salgueiro" <[email-masked]
> <mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
>
>> Fully support it.
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On Sep 29, 2011, at 4:32 PM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:
>>
>>> We have a milestone to submit an "SDP extension to classify traffic"
>>> in August 2012.
>>>
>>> We have a draft that can be used as a design base to meet this goal,
>>> this is the "trafficlass" attribute:
>>>
>>> <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-polk-mmusic-traffic-class-for-sdp/>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-polk-mmusic-traffic-class-for-sdp/
>>>
>>> We would like to poll the WG for consensus to adopt such draft as a WG
>>> item in order to meet the mentioned milestone.
>>>
>>> Please indicate whether you support it or if not.
>>>
>>> Miguel and Flemming
>>> --
>>> Miguel A. Garcia
>>> +34-91-339-3608
>>> Ericsson Spain
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mmusic mailing list
>>> [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

-- 
Miguel A. Garcia
+34-91-339-3608
Ericsson Spain