Subject: [MMUSIC] [Errata Rejected] RFC5245 (3952)

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:07:43 -0700 (PDT)

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5245,
"Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5245&eid=3952

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Suresh Tummala <[email-masked]>
Date Reported: 2014-04-04
Rejected by: Richard Barnes (IESG)

Section: 15.1

Original Text
-------------
priority = 1*10DIGIT

Corrected Text
--------------

Notes
-----
priority = 1*10DIGIT

Here the maximum value it can hold is "9999999999"(ten-nines)(priority is of maximum length 10 DIGIT as per grammar in sec 15.1).

The number of bits required to hold the maximum value(ten-nines) is 34. Which requires a "double" value instead of integer of 32 bit.

Can i know why the priority is maximum of 10 DIGIT length? If possible we may decrease to 9 DIGIT, so that the value will be fit into integer of 32bit.

-- VERIFIER NOTES -- 
The limitation to 2^32-1 is made clear elsewhere in the text. The ABNF does not need to enforce this constraint

--------------------------------------
RFC5245 (draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-19)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal for Offer/Answer Protocols
Publication Date    : April 2010
Author(s)           : J. Rosenberg
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiparty Multimedia Session Control
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG