Subject: [MMUSIC] RID Open Issue #1: Declarative SDP

From: Adam Roach <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:06:12 -0600

I'm putting up the open issues in the RID draft that haven't had dedicated threads yet for a final round of discussion.

For this one, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-rid-04#section-7

    Section 7 describes the use of "a=rid" for declarative SDP.  This is
    a pretty small amount of work, and the use of this mechanism to
    describe how a sender is going to constrain a stream does have some
    amount of utility.  Is the text sufficient?  If not, do we want to
    invest the work needed to make RID work with declarative use cases?

    PROPOSAL: Keep the current text.

If you disagree with the proposal, please send email in the next few days with an alternate proposal.

Thanks!

/a