Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE errata

From: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:16:36 +0000

Hi,

Do people agree that the following errata is valid, and should be verified?

https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6437

My intention is to implement the verified erratas in BUNDLEbis.

Regards,

Christer

---

From: Magnus Westerlund <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 12:25:30 +0000

Hi,

Looks correct to me. 

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

From: mmusic <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
Sent: den 29 mars 2021 13:17
To: IETF MMUSIC WG <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE errata

Hi,

https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6437
<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ec1e3c14-b3850512-ec1e7c8f-86ee86bd51
07-6f6f9b7a5df4909f&q=1&e=d9bfe218-8a54-4ebc-b2be-76e5a3697e32&u=https%3A%2F
%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid6437> 

Regards,

Christer

---

From: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:30:31 +0000

Chairs, 

As nobody has objected, can we change the status from "Reported" to
"Verified"?

I will then implement the change in the BUNDLE-bis draft.

Regards,

Christer

From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=[email-masked]> 
Sent: maanantai 29. maaliskuuta 2021 15.26
To: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: RE: BUNDLE errata

Hi,

Looks correct to me. 

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

From: mmusic <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> > On
Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
Sent: den 29 mars 2021 13:17
To: IETF MMUSIC WG <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> >
Cc: [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]> 
Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE errata

Hi,

Regards,

Christer

---

From: Flemming Andreasen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:20:15 -0400

It looks more like a "Hold for Document Update" to me (per 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/). 
In either case, the errata seems correct and we will ask for the status 
to be updated.

Cheers

-- Flemming

On 3/30/21 9:30 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> Chairs,
>
> As nobody has objected, can we change the status from “Reported” to 
> “Verified”?
>
> *From:*Magnus Westerlund 
> <magnus.westerlund=[email-masked]>
> *Sent:* maanantai 29. maaliskuuta 2021 15.26
> *To:* Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
> *Cc:* [email-masked]
> *Subject:* RE: BUNDLE errata
>
> Hi,
>
> Looks correct to me.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus Westerlund
>
> *From:*mmusic <[email-masked] 
> <mailto:[email-masked]>> *On Behalf Of *Christer Holmberg
> *Sent:* den 29 mars 2021 13:17
> *To:* IETF MMUSIC WG <[email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>>
> *Cc:* [email-masked] <mailto:[email-masked]>
> *Subject:* [MMUSIC] BUNDLE errata
>
> Hi,
>
> <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ec1e3c14-b3850512-ec1e7c8f-86ee86bd5107-6f6f9b7a5df4909f&q=1&e=d9bfe218-8a54-4ebc-b2be-76e5a3697e32&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid6437>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

---

From: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:44:24 +0000

Hi,

>It looks more like a "Hold for Document Update" to me (per https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/). In either case, the errata seems correct and we will ask for the status to be updated.
Then we should also change the status of https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6431 from "Verified" to "Hold for Document Update", because I intend to implement that errata too.
Regards,
Christer

As nobody has objected, can we change the status from "Reported" to "Verified"?

Regards,

Christer

From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund=[email-masked]><mailto:magnus.westerlund=[email-masked]>
Sent: maanantai 29. maaliskuuta 2021 15.26
To: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]><mailto:[email-masked]>; [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: RE: BUNDLE errata

Hi,

Looks correct to me.

Cheers

Magnus Westerlund

From: mmusic <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
Sent: den 29 mars 2021 13:17
To: IETF MMUSIC WG <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE errata

Hi,

https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6437<https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ec1e3c14-b3850512-ec1e7c8f-86ee86bd5107-6f6f9b7a5df4909f&q=1&e=d9bfe218-8a54-4ebc-b2be-76e5a3697e32&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid6437>

Regards,

Christer

mmusic mailing list

[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>

---

From: Flemming Andreasen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 13:24:42 -0400

On 3/30/21 12:44 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/ 
> <https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-rfc-errata/>). 
> In either case, the errata seems correct and we will ask for the 
> status to be updated.
>
> Then we should also change the status of 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6431 
> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6431> from “Verified” to “Hold 
> for Document Update”, because I intend to implement that errata too.
>
I think that one is ok as "Verified". In either case, both should be 
addressed in the updated document.

Cheers

-- Flemming

>     As nobody has objected, can we change the status from “Reported”
>     to “Verified”?
>
>     <mailto:magnus.westerlund=[email-masked]>
>     *To:* Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>
>     <mailto:[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
>     <mailto:[email-masked]>
>     [email-masked]  <mailto:[email-masked]>
>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic  <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>
>