Subject: RE: [mobile-ip] A question about mobile ip MIB draft

From: "Rathi, Ravindra" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 09:17:43 -0700

Peter,
       The index object need not be part of the same table.
It can be defined in
- some other MIB
- part of some other table in same MIB.

In this case, index objects
 haMobilityBindingMnIdType, haMobilityBindingMnId

are part of 'haMobilityBindingTable' which is defined 
before  'haRegCounterTable'.

Thanks,
Rathi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Zou [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:32 PM
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: [mobile-ip] A question about mobile ip MIB draft
> 
> 
> I have a question about the draft of mobile ip MIB:
> "The Definitions of Managed Objects for IP Mobility Support 
> using SMIv2,
> revised draft-ietf-mobileip-rfc2006bis-01.txt" 
> 
> In the "haRegCounterEntry", it says the index will be
> "haMobilityBindingMnIdType" and "haMobilityBindingId".
> However, in the table itself, the indexes are nowhere to be 
> found. So how
> does anyone index into the haRegCounterTable?
> 
> The same thing happens to haRegCounterTable in RFC 2006. So 
> what do I miss
> here?
> 
> 
> Thanks
> -Peter
>