Subject: RE: [mobile-ip] RFC3012bis - Comments from ADs (Protocol related) (ISSUE 4)

From: "Ahmad Muhanna" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:51:44 -0500

Please see comments inline.

Regards;
Ahmad Muhanna

Non-editorial comments associated with RFC3012bis:

Please post your comments with the appropriate issue number in the subject
line (instead of simply replying to this email).

-Chairs.

4. If there are multiple FAs on the visited link, is the assumption
   that the MN needs to track which FAs have issued which challenge?
   If so it would make sense to make this clear.

This absolutely very obvious. 
Do we mention any where else that the MN must keep track with all FAs which
support Reverse 
Tunneling. I mean this absolutely obvious and no further clarification is
needed. The whole RFC 
talks about a MN and A FA.

Regards,
Ahmad