Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Erratum for RFC 5586

From: Adrian Farrel <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 20:07:38 +0000

Hi,

Having looked at the comments received on the list, I will process this 
Erratum as planned.
I will ask IANA to update the registry.

Regards,
Adrian

>> >> The Erratum fixes the allocation to read:
>> >>
>> >>    0 - 32759 : IETF Review
>> >>    32760 - 32767 : Experimental
>> >>    32768 - 65535 : IETF Review
>> >>
>> >> This choice is made to keep the Experimental range where it
>> >> has already been defined (so as not to impact any existing
>> >> implementations) and to cover the rest of the codepoints.