Subject: [mpls-tp] EXTENDED: Poll on OAM related drafts to ccamp wg documents

From: Lou Berger <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:51:04 -0500

CCAMP, MPLS-TP, MPLS-TP ad hoc team,

Loa (and others) have correctly pointed out that this poll should have
been announced on all three lists as it includes an MPLS-TP document.
As the announcement on the other lists was delayed, the comment/poll
period has been extended through Monday March 1.

Please send comments to the ccamp list.

Thank you,
Lou (CCAMP co-chair)

On 2/12/2010 5:49 AM, Loa Andersson wrote:
> MPLS-TP ad hoc team,
> 
> please note that the ccamp working group in the IETF are polling
> draft-bellagamba-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext to become a
> working group docuemnt.
> 
> Comments should be sent to ccamp working group mailing list.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> Lou Berger wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The authors of the drafts have stated that they are ready for this
>> poll to resume.  Therefore:
>>
>> This message starts a two week poll on making the documents listed below
>> ccamp working group documents.  Please send a mail to the mailing list
>> indicating "yes/support to both" or "no/do not support either".  Of
>> course, you may also support one but not the other.  (We will assume
>> that you support/object to both if you don't specify.)  Please send
>> mail even if you expressed an opinion on the prior poll.
>>
>> The documents being polled are:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bellagamba-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext
>>
>> The poll ends Tuesday February 23.
>>
>> Much thanks,
>> Lou
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [CCAMP] Suspended: poll on making
>> draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext-01.txt ccamp wg document
>> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:07:03 -0500
>> From: Lou Berger <[email-masked]>
>> To: [email-masked]
>>
>> The document authors have asked that we defer this poll until they make
>> some further updates to this document.  The plan will be to re-poll the
>> WG once the document authors inform us that the changes have been made.
>>   Given recent discussion on the list, I expect that this poll will take
>> place together with the other technology specific OAM document,
>> draft-bellagamba-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext.
>>
>> Please keep in mind that becoming a WG document does not mean that the
>> technical details of a document are frozen.  It does mean that the
>> working group becomes the authoritative body for technical content,
>> i.e., WG consensus drives a WG document while author consensus drives an
>> individual document.
>>
>> Lou
>>
>> On 11/23/2009 5:20 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS) wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> This is to start a two week poll on making
>>> draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext-01.txt a ccamp working group
>>> document. Send a mail to the mailing list indicating "yes/support" or
>>> "no/do not support".
>>>
>>> The poll ends Monday, Dec. 7, 2009.
>>>
>>> Deborah
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CCAMP mailing list
>>> [email-masked]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>