Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] A new IDdraft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching

From: "Ryoo, Jeong-dong" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:15:04 +0900

Dear Vivien,

Yes, it is.

As the efforts on modifying the previous linear protection draft to address some issues turned out to be
not so successful, and the draft became a WG document, we would like to correct the situation by submitting another draft on linear protection.

Thanks,

Jeong-dong

==============================================
Jeong-dong Ryoo, Ph.D.
Principal Member of Research Staff
Network Research Department
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)
Phone: +82-42-860-5384, Fax: +82-42-860-6342
Email: [email-masked]
==============================================

-----원본 메시지-----
From: "Vivien Sterling" <[email-masked]>
From Date: 2010-03-25 오전 5:53:16
To: "Loa Andersson" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] A new IDdraft-zulr-mpls-tp-linear-protection-switching

Hi Loa,

?

I was also surprised?to find this new draft. Actually I'm studying [draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-01] recently. It looks to me the new draft-zulr is trying to solve?the issues in?[draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-01] some of which were raised on the mailing list. Is that true? Could the authors make some clarifications?

?

--
Cheers,
Vivien