Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Query regarding the PSC Channel Codeindraft"draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-02.txt"

From: "Adrian Farrel" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2010 17:47:57 +0100

What Eric says seems right to me.

I guess that if there are a number of early implementations that want to
start interoperability testing they can pick a number for their private
work. As this matures, they might want to come to the WG and ask the chairs
to consider requesting an early codepoint allocation from IANA.

Cheers,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Eric Osborne (eosborne)" <[email-masked]>
To: "Selvan" <[email-masked]>; <[email-masked]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [mpls-tp] Query regarding the PSC Channel
Codeindraft"draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-02.txt"

> As far as I know there isn't one yet; that's why it's 'TBD'.  This will
> be assigned as the draft progresses towards standardization.
>
> eric
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On
> Behalf
>> Of Selvan
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 10:34 AM
>> To: [email-masked]
>> Subject: [mpls-tp] Query regarding the PSC Channel Code indraft"draft-
>> ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-02.txt"
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Kindly clarify the G-Ach channel number assigned to PSC message
>> explained in draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-02, Section 4.2
>>
>> "MPLS-TP PSC Channel Code is the G-ACh channel number assigned to the
>> PSC = TBD"
>>
>> Could you please let us know the proposed value (IANA to be assigned)
>> for PSC Channel Code?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Selvan